| Title |
Evaluating the predictive power of field variables for species and individual molecular identification on wolf noninvasive samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-017-1112-7 |
| Authors |
Mónia Nakamura, Raquel Godinho, H. Rio-Maior, S. Roque, A. Kaliontzopoulou, J. Bernardo, D. Castro, S. Lopes, F. Petrucci-Fonseca, F. Álvares |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 24% |
| Researcher | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,827,847
of 24,475,473 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#366
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,725
of 317,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,475,473 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.