↓ Skip to main content

Thiamine in excitable tissues: Reflections on a non-cofactor role

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolic Brain Disease, September 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Thiamine in excitable tissues: Reflections on a non-cofactor role
Published in
Metabolic Brain Disease, September 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01991194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucien Bettendorff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Other 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1997.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Metabolic Brain Disease
#341
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,303
of 21,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolic Brain Disease
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them