↓ Skip to main content

Virtual CT autopsy in clinical pathology: feasibility in clinical autopsies

Overview of attention for article published in Virchows Archiv, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Virtual CT autopsy in clinical pathology: feasibility in clinical autopsies
Published in
Virchows Archiv, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00428-012-1257-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia E. Westphal, Jonas Apitzsch, Tobias Penzkofer, Andreas H. Mahnken, Ruth Knüchel

Abstract

For the past century, autopsy techniques in clinical pathology have not changed significantly, while autopsy rates are declining. Modern imaging techniques offer interesting prospects of supportive post-mortem diagnostic investigation. In a prospective study of 29 autopsy cases, complimentary virtual autopsy using unenhanced post-mortem computed tomography (pmCT) was performed. We analysed in a prospective cohort study 29 unenhanced pmCT scans, generated prior to autopsy. Clinical information regarding clinical history and circumstances of death were provided. The objective of the study was to find consistency and/or discrepancy between virtual autopsy and conventional autopsy findings regarding cause of death and death-related diagnoses, reconstruction of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved, side diagnoses and CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation)- or death-related post-mortem changes. Accuracy of pmCT for cause of death was 68 % and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 75 %. Regarding the pathogenetic mechanisms, accuracy of pmCT was 21 % and PPV was 29 %. The combined diagnostic yield of autopsy and pmCT was 133 % compared to autopsy only. Modern imaging techniques give an opportunity for post-mortem diagnostics to complete but not yet replace traditional autopsy. We could show that in two out of three cases, the cause of death found by pmCT matched the diagnosis from classical autopsy. While both disciplines, pathology and radiology, will profit from the mutual exchange of data, it seems a realistic aim to strive for virtual autopsy possibly further supported by biopsies and contrast-enhanced pmCT as an alternative to the classical clinical autopsy. A combination of both methods enhances diagnostic quality and completeness of the autopsy report.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 27 38%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,438,522
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#409
of 1,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,738
of 164,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.