↓ Skip to main content

Australian beer wars and pub demand: how vertical restraints improved the drinking experience

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Economics, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Australian beer wars and pub demand: how vertical restraints improved the drinking experience
Published in
Applied Economics, February 2007
DOI 10.1080/0003684042000191877
Authors

Ryan Donnar, Keith Jakee *

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Applied Economics
#534
of 1,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,132
of 161,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Economics
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.