↓ Skip to main content

Do clinical guidelines improve management of sepsis in critically ill elderly patients? A before-and-after study of the implementation of a sepsis protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Medica Austriaca, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Do clinical guidelines improve management of sepsis in critically ill elderly patients? A before-and-after study of the implementation of a sepsis protocol
Published in
Acta Medica Austriaca, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00508-012-0229-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Juergen Heppner, Katrin Singler, Anja Kwetkat, Steffen Popp, Adelheid Susanne Esslinger, Philipp Bahrmann, Matthias Kaiser, Thomas Bertsch, Cornel Christian Sieber, Michael Christ

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#736
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,469
of 186,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.