↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR-engineered genome editing for the next generation neurological disease modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CRISPR-engineered genome editing for the next generation neurological disease modeling
Published in
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.05.019
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Neurological disorders often occur because of failure of proper brain development and/or appropriate maintenance of neuronal circuits. In order to understand roles of causative factors (e.g. genes, cell types) in disease development, generation of solid animal models has been one of straight-forward approaches. Recent next generation sequencing studies on human patient-derived clinical samples have identified various types of recurrent mutations in individual neurological diseases. While these discoveries have prompted us to evaluate contribution of mutated genes to these neurological diseases, a feasible but flexible genome editing tool had remained to be developed. An advance of genome editing technology using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) with the CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) offers us a tremendous potential to create a variety of mutations in the cell, leading to "next generation" disease models carrying disease-associated mutations. We will here review recent progress of CRISPR-based brain disease modeling studies and discuss future requirement to improve current difficulties in usage of these technologies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#28,640,276
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry
#2,769
of 3,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,653
of 358,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry
#71
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.