| Title |
Is Confucianism Good for Business Ethics in China?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-009-0120-2 |
| Authors |
Po Keung Ip |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 263 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 19% |
| Unknown | 58 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 104 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 26 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,187
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,257
of 94,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.