You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does insufficient adjustment for smoking explain the preventive effects of fruit and vegetables on lung cancer?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lung Cancer (01695002), July 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.lungcan.2003.12.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Halla Skuladottir, Anne Tjoenneland, Kim Overvad, Connie Stripp, Jane Christensen, Ole Raaschou-Nielsen, Jørgen H Olsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
| Researcher | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer (01695002)
#449
of 3,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,218
of 59,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer (01695002)
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.