| Title |
The anatomic approach to primary, revision and augmentation anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-010-1191-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carola F. van Eck, Verena M. Schreiber, T. Thomas Liu, Freddie H. Fu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 25% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,213,370
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#482
of 2,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,599
of 96,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.