| Title |
Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross‐pin and suspensory graft fixation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-008-0606-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua A. Baumfeld, David R. Diduch, L. Joseph Rubino, Jennifer A. Hart, Mark D. Miller, Michelle S. Barr, Joseph M. Hart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 49% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,213,370
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#482
of 2,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,054
of 88,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.