↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying fine-scale resource selection by introduced feral cats to complement management decision-making in ecologically sensitive areas

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Quantifying fine-scale resource selection by introduced feral cats to complement management decision-making in ecologically sensitive areas
Published in
Biological Invasions, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10530-013-0635-4
Authors

Mariano R. Recio, Renaud Mathieu, Emilio Virgós, Philip J. Seddon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 49%
Environmental Science 10 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,886
of 2,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,453
of 308,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.