↓ Skip to main content

Mating system, multiple paternity and effective population size in the endemic flatback turtle (Natator depressus) in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Mating system, multiple paternity and effective population size in the endemic flatback turtle (Natator depressus) in Australia
Published in
Conservation Genetics, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10592-008-9583-4
Authors

Kathrin Theissinger, N. N. FitzSimmons, C. J. Limpus, C. J. Parmenter, A. D. Phillott

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Serbia 2 1%
United States 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 129 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 19%
Researcher 27 19%
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Other 10 7%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 54%
Environmental Science 33 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Chemistry 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#469
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,537
of 81,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.