↓ Skip to main content

Age-related radiological imaging in children with acute pyelonephritis

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Age-related radiological imaging in children with acute pyelonephritis
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, January 2002
DOI 10.1007/s004670200005
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Ilyas, S. T. Mastin, G. A. Richard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 70%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2007.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,512
of 3,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,759
of 123,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,575 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.