↓ Skip to main content

Predictive Validity of 4 Risk Assessment Scales for Prediction of Pressure Ulcer Development in a Hospital Setting

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in skin & wound care (Print), February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictive Validity of 4 Risk Assessment Scales for Prediction of Pressure Ulcer Development in a Hospital Setting
Published in
Advances in skin & wound care (Print), February 2014
DOI 10.1097/01.asw.0000439059.72199.41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulrika Källman, Margareta Lindgren

Abstract

The aims of this study were to examine and compare the predictive validity of 4 risk assessment scales used for the prediction of pressure ulcer (PrU) development and to identify risk factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 26%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 23 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Advances in skin & wound care (Print)
#685
of 1,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,996
of 322,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in skin & wound care (Print)
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.