| Title |
Response in individuals with and without foreign background and application to the National Cohort in Germany: which factors have an effect?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-013-0539-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Volker Winkler, Michael Leitzmann, Nadia Obi, Wolfgang Ahrens, Thomas Edinger, Guido Giani, Jakob Linseisen, Markus Löffler, Karin Michels, Ute Nöthlings, Sabine Schipf, Alexander Kluttig, H.-Erich Wichmann, Barbara Hoffmann, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Heiko Becher |
| Abstract |
Response rates in epidemiologic studies vary widely. This study examines response rates of potential study participants according to foreign versus German background and investigates effects of recruitment strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 31% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#734
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,458
of 318,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.