↓ Skip to main content

Research Methods in Child Disaster Studies: A Review of Studies Generated by the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks; the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami; and Hurricane Katrina

Overview of attention for article published in Child & Youth Care Forum, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Research Methods in Child Disaster Studies: A Review of Studies Generated by the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks; the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami; and Hurricane Katrina
Published in
Child & Youth Care Forum, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10566-013-9211-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Betty Pfefferbaum, Carl F. Weems, Brandon G. Scott, Pascal Nitiéma, Mary A. Noffsinger, Rose L. Pfefferbaum, Vandana Varma, Amarsha Chakraburtty

Abstract

A comprehensive review of the design principles and methodological approaches that have been used to make inferences from the research on disasters in children is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 166 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Unspecified 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 31%
Social Sciences 20 12%
Unspecified 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,400,722
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Child & Youth Care Forum
#142
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,545
of 196,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child & Youth Care Forum
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.