You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How do supervising physicians decide to entrust residents with unsupervised tasks? A qualitative analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hospital Medicine, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jhm.2150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin J. Choo, Vineet M. Arora, Paul Barach, Julie K. Johnson, Jeanne M. Farnan |
| Abstract |
Medical supervisors struggle to find meaningful ways to evaluate the preparedness of trainees to independently perform patient care tasks. The aim of this study was to describe the factors that influence how attending and resident physician perceptions of trust impact decision making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 28% |
| Unknown | 31 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2014.
All research outputs
#19,985,639
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hospital Medicine
#2,144
of 2,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,627
of 316,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hospital Medicine
#55
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.