↓ Skip to main content

Ethically Justified, Clinically Applicable Criteria for Physician Decision-Making in Psychopharmacological Enhancement

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Ethically Justified, Clinically Applicable Criteria for Physician Decision-Making in Psychopharmacological Enhancement
Published in
Neuroethics, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12152-008-9029-1
Authors

Matthis Synofzik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 5%
Netherlands 2 3%
Spain 2 3%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Psychology 14 22%
Philosophy 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,216,580
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#410
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,568
of 170,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.