You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emergency Medicine Australasia, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1742-6723.12164 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Than, Dylan Flaws, Sharon Sanders, Jenny Doust, Paul Glasziou, Jeffery Kline, Sally Aldous, Richard Troughton, Christopher Reid, William A Parsonage, Christopher Frampton, Jaimi H Greenslade, Joanne M Deely, Erik Hess, Amr Bin Sadiq, Rose Singleton, Rosie Shopland, Laura Vercoe, Morgana Woolhouse‐Williams, Michael Ardagh, Patrick Bossuyt, Laura Bannister, Louise Cullen |
| Abstract |
Risk scores and accelerated diagnostic protocols can identify chest pain patients with low risk of major adverse cardiac event who could be discharged early from the ED, saving time and costs. We aimed to derive and validate a chest pain score and accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) that could safely increase the proportion of patients suitable for early discharge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| Australia | 5 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| South Africa | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 33% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 55 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#895,020
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Medicine Australasia
#42
of 1,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,774
of 341,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Medicine Australasia
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.