↓ Skip to main content

The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus in the pathogenesis of post-stroke psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus in the pathogenesis of post-stroke psychosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00415-014-7242-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Devine, Paul Bentley, Brynmor Jones, Gary Hotton, Richard J. Greenwood, I. Harri Jenkins, Eileen M. Joyce, Paresh A. Malhotra

Abstract

Psychotic symptoms have previously been reported following right hemisphere brain injury. We sought to identify the specific neuroanatomical basis of delusions following stroke by studying a series of patients with post-stroke psychosis. Lesion overlap analysis was conducted on three individuals with delusions following right hemisphere stroke. These cases were compared with a control group of patients with similar anatomical damage. The main outcome measures were presence of delusions and presence of behavioural susceptibility. The right inferior frontal gyrus and underlying white matter, including the superior longitudinal fasciculus and anterior corona radiata, were involved in all three cases. All three had a preexisting untreated psychiatric disorder. In contrast, only one of nine control cases with equivalent lesions had evidence of previous psychiatric disorder (p = 0.0182, Fisher's exact test), and this was being treated at the time of stroke. We provide clinical evidence from patients with structural brain lesions implicating damage to the right inferior frontal lobe in the generation of persistent psychosis following stroke. We suggest that preexisting psychiatric disease provided a behavioural susceptibility to develop delusions in these individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Neuroscience 10 15%
Psychology 9 14%
Computer Science 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 20 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,891,407
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#2,680
of 4,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,125
of 305,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.