↓ Skip to main content

Reflections on the development and implementation of an early warning system for ecstasy and related drug markets in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Drug & Alcohol Review, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflections on the development and implementation of an early warning system for ecstasy and related drug markets in Australia
Published in
Drug & Alcohol Review, May 2009
DOI 10.1080/09595230600876705
Pubmed ID
Authors

STUART A. KINNER, LOUISA DEGENHARDT

Abstract

Regular and systematic monitoring of drug markets provides the basis for evidence-based policy. In Australia, trends in ecstasy and related drug (ERD) markets have been monitored in selected jurisdictions since 2000 and nationally since 2003, by the Party Drugs Initiative (PDI). The PDI maximises the validity of conclusions by triangulating information from (a) interviews with regular ecstasy users (REU), (b) interviews with key experts and (c) indicator data. There is currently no other system in Australia for monitoring these markets systematically; however, the value of the PDI has been constrained by the quality of available data. Difficulties in recruiting and interviewing appropriate consumers (REU) and key experts have been experienced, but largely overcome. Limitations of available indicator data from both health and law enforcement continue to present challenges and there remains considerable scope for enhancing existing routine data collection systems, to facilitate monitoring of ERD markets. With an expanding market for ecstasy and related drugs in Australia, and in the context of indicator data that continue to be limited in scope and detail, there is a strong argument for the continued collection of annual, comparable data from a sentinel group of REU, such as those recruited for the PDI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Unspecified 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Unspecified 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Drug & Alcohol Review
#1,846
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,654
of 125,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug & Alcohol Review
#359
of 372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.