You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systemic intervention for public health.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Public Health, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.2105/ajph.2005.067660 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerald Midgley |
| Abstract |
Many calls have been made for a systems approach to public health. My response is to offer a methodology for systemic intervention that (1) emphasizes the need to explore stakeholder values and boundaries for analysis, (2) challenges marginalization, and (3) draws upon a wide range of methods (from the systems literature and beyond) to create a flexible and responsive systems practice.I present and discuss several well-tested methods with a view to identifying their potential for supporting systemic intervention for public health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 19% |
| Researcher | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 50 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 18% |
| Psychology | 21 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 24% |
| Unknown | 41 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,229,156
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Public Health
#5,320
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,235
of 170,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Public Health
#30
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.