| Title |
Positive affect and decision frame in negotiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Group Decision and Negotiation, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10726-007-9090-x |
| Authors |
Peter J. Carnevale |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 44 | 34% |
| Psychology | 28 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,938,478
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Group Decision and Negotiation
#7
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,940
of 72,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Decision and Negotiation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them