You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
De novo mutations in schizophrenia implicate synaptic networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature12929 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Menachem Fromer, Andrew J. Pocklington, David H. Kavanagh, Hywel J. Williams, Sarah Dwyer, Padhraig Gormley, Lyudmila Georgieva, Elliott Rees, Priit Palta, Douglas M. Ruderfer, Noa Carrera, Isla Humphreys, Jessica S. Johnson, Panos Roussos, Douglas D. Barker, Eric Banks, Vihra Milanova, Seth G. Grant, Eilis Hannon, Samuel A. Rose, Kimberly Chambert, Milind Mahajan, Edward M. Scolnick, Jennifer L. Moran, George Kirov, Aarno Palotie, Steven A. McCarroll, Peter Holmans, Pamela Sklar, Michael J. Owen, Shaun M. Purcell, Michael C. O’Donovan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 10% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Ireland | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 52 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 56% |
| Scientists | 50 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,649 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1571 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 349 | 21% |
| Researcher | 300 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 232 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 160 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 83 | 5% |
| Other | 318 | 19% |
| Unknown | 207 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 472 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 308 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 226 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 213 | 13% |
| Psychology | 65 | 4% |
| Other | 112 | 7% |
| Unknown | 253 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 328. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#103,392
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#7,092
of 98,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#867
of 322,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#83
of 899 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 899 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.