↓ Skip to main content

Microfracture technique versus osteochondral autologous transplantation mosaicplasty in patients with articular chondral lesions of the knee: a prospective randomized trial with long‐term follow‐up

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Microfracture technique versus osteochondral autologous transplantation mosaicplasty in patients with articular chondral lesions of the knee: a prospective randomized trial with long‐term follow‐up
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00167-014-2843-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Svend Ulstein, Asbjørn Årøen, Jan Harald Røtterud, Sverre Løken, Lars Engebretsen, Stig Heir

Abstract

To compare long-term functional and radiological outcome following microfracture technique (MF) versus osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) mosaicplasty for treating focal chondral lesions of the knee.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Unknown 177 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 47 26%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Engineering 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 55 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,435,788
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#652
of 2,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,190
of 305,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#15
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.