You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental Joint Quantum Measurements with Minimum Uncertainty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Review Letters, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1103/physrevlett.112.020401 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Ringbauer, Devon N. Biggerstaff, Matthew A. Broome, Alessandro Fedrizzi, Cyril Branciard, Andrew G. White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 54 | 69% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,178,424
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#3,646
of 37,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,403
of 331,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#42
of 613 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 613 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.