| Title |
Evaluation of a digital echo sounder system for detection of submersed aquatic vegetation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estuaries and Coasts, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02696057 |
| Authors |
Bruce M. Sabol, R. Eddie Melton, Robert Chamberlain, Peter Doering, Kathy Haunert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Researcher | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 26 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 19% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#498
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,341
of 132,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them