| Title |
AREA AND HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS OF BIRDS IN GREAT LAKES COASTAL WET MEADOWS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wetlands, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0492:aahrob]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Samuel K. Riffell, Brian E. Keas, Thomas M. Burton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#226
of 1,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,172
of 124,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them