↓ Skip to main content

Problems with using overlay mapping for planning and their implications for geographic information systems

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, January 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Problems with using overlay mapping for planning and their implications for geographic information systems
Published in
Environmental Management, January 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf01867373
Authors

Robert G. Bailey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 10%
Engineering 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,488
of 49,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.