↓ Skip to main content

Cardiorespiratory responses and myocardial function within incremental exercise in healthy unmedicated older vs. young men and women

Overview of attention for article published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Cardiorespiratory responses and myocardial function within incremental exercise in healthy unmedicated older vs. young men and women
Published in
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40520-017-0776-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo Farinatti, Walace Monteiro, Ricardo Oliveira, Antonio Crisafulli

Abstract

Age-related differences concerning cardiorespiratory responses and myocardial function during exercise have not been extensively investigated in healthy populations. To compare cardiorespiratory performance and myocardial function during maximal exercise in healthy/unmedicated men (older, n = 24, 63-75 years; young, n = 22, 19-25 years) and women (older, n = 18, age = 63-74 years; young, n = 23, 19-25 years). Oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilation minute (V E), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q), O2 pulse (O2p), preejection period (PEP), and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) were assessed during cycle incremental exercise. HR and SV remained equivalent between age groups until 75 and 50% peak workload, respectively. Q increased by 2.5 and 4.5 times in older and young groups, respectively. However, Q/VO2 ratio was always similar across age and sex groups (∼0.50). The energetic efficiency ratio (W/VO2) was also alike in older and young men, but slightly lower in women. At maximal exercise, cardiorespiratory responses were lower in older than young men and women: VO2 (-40 to 50%), V E (-35 to 37%), HR (-23%), SV (-26 to 29%), Q (-43 to 45%), and O2p (-15 to 20%). Cardiac and SV indices were lower in older than young groups by approximately 42 and 25%, respectively. LVET was longer in the older individuals, while PEP was similar across age groups. Hence, PEP/LVET was lowered among older vs. young men and women. Submaximal work capacity was preserved in healthy and unmedicated older individuals. Age-related lessening of maximal performance in both sexes was due to poor chronotropic and, particularly, inotropic properties of the heart.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Professor 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 13 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Sports and Recreations 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#1,705
of 1,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,197
of 326,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#24
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.