↓ Skip to main content

Long term decomposition: the influence of litter type and soil horizon on retention of plant carbon and nitrogen in soils

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,054)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Long term decomposition: the influence of litter type and soil horizon on retention of plant carbon and nitrogen in soils
Published in
Biogeochemistry, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10533-017-0345-6
Authors

Caitlin E. Hicks Pries, Jeffrey A. Bird, Cristina Castanha, Pierre-Joseph Hatton, Margaret S. Torn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 31%
Student > Master 26 19%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 7 5%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 31%
Environmental Science 37 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,198,972
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#50
of 1,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,162
of 312,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.