↓ Skip to main content

Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibition provides protection against lung injury in a rat paraquat toxicity model

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammopharmacology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibition provides protection against lung injury in a rat paraquat toxicity model
Published in
Inflammopharmacology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10787-016-0268-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salim Kemal Tuncer, Seher Altinel, Mehmet Toygar, Hakan Istanbulluoglu, Kahraman Ates, Recai Ogur, Ozcan Altinel, Yildirim Karslioglu, Turgut Topal, Ahmet Korkmaz, Bulent Uysal

Abstract

Paraquat (PQ) is a widely used herbicide. Exposure to PQ at toxic doses can result in fatal acute lung injury. Inhibition of the poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzyme alleviates inflammation and necrosis in various pathologies. Here we aimed to evaluate the effects of PARP inhibition on PQ-induced lung damage in a rat experimental model. Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 24) were allocated into three groups: sham, PQ and PQ + 3-aminobenzamide (3-AB) that is a PARP inhibitor, groups. Experimental lung injury was induced by administration of 15 mg/kg PQ intraperitoneally in PQ and PQ + 3-AB groups. 3-AB (10 mg/kg twice per day) was administered to the PQ + 3-AB group for four consecutive days. The animals were killed on the fifth day following PQ administration. Lung tissue and blood samples were collected and stored until analysis. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and neopterin levels, tissue oxidative stress parameters, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β) levels and histological injury scores in the PQ + 3-AB group were significantly lower than in the PQ group (P < 0.05, PQ vs. PQ + 3-AB). Total antioxidant capacity in the PQ + 3-AB group was significantly higher than in the PQ group (P < 0.05, PQ + 3-AB vs. PQ). Our results suggested that the use of PARP inhibitors following PQ toxicity might be useful for minimizing lung injury due to paraquat toxicity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Chemistry 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,425,762
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Inflammopharmacology
#434
of 542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,265
of 341,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammopharmacology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.