You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intensified Tuberculosis Case-Finding in HIV-Positive Adults Managed at Ethiopian Health Centers: Diagnostic Yield of Xpert MTB/RIF Compared with Smear Microscopy and Liquid Culture
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0085478 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taye T. Balcha, Erik Sturegård, Niclas Winqvist, Sten Skogmar, Anton Reepalu, Zelalem Habtamu Jemal, Gudeta Tibesso, Thomas Schön, Per Björkman |
Abstract |
Detection of active tuberculosis (TB) before antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation is important, but optimal diagnostic methods for use in resource-limited settings are lacking. We assessed the prevalence of TB, evaluated the diagnostic yield of Xpert MTB/RIF in comparison with smear microscopy and culture, and the impact of Xpert results on clinical management in HIV-positive adults eligible for ART at health centers in a region of Ethiopia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 229 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 46 | 20% |
Student > Master | 42 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
Other | 37 | 16% |
Unknown | 38 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 5% |
Other | 36 | 16% |
Unknown | 52 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#12,892,336
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#100,578
of 194,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,125
of 305,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,721
of 5,578 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,578 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.