↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory involvement in ambulant and non-ambulant patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory involvement in ambulant and non-ambulant patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
Published in
Journal of Neurology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00415-017-8525-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Moreira, Libby Wood, Debbie Smith, Chiara Marini-Bettolo, Michela Guglieri, Grace McMacken, Geraldine Bailey, Anna Mayhew, Robert Muni-Lofra, Gail Eglon, Maggie Williams, Volker Straub, Hanns Lochmüller, Teresinha Evangelista

Abstract

Understand the occurrence and predictors of respiratory impairment in FSHD. Data from 100 FSHD patients was collected regarding demographics, genetics, respiratory status and pulmonary function tests, clinical manifestations and Clinical Severity Scale (CSS) scores. Patients were assigned to two severity groups using CSS: mild (scores <3.5) and moderate/severely affected (scores ≥3.5). Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) was classified as severely impaired if less than 50% of the predicted. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23, tests were two-tailed and the level of significance set at 5%. Spirometry was available for 94 patients; 41.5% had abnormal results with a restrictive pattern in 38.3% patients. There was a correlation between FVC; CSS score and D4Z4 fragment length with a higher probability of severe respiratory involvement in the early onset group, moderate/severe disease and D4Z4 fragments <18 kb. Patients with severe respiratory involvement showed a high prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing. FVC decline over time was indicative of three progression groups. Respiratory involvement for both ambulant and non-ambulant patients with FSHD is more frequent and severe than previously suggested. Sleep-disordered breathing is frequent and negatively influences the respiratory status. Annual screening of the respiratory status with spirometry and clinical assessment is thus warranted in FSHD patients, even while ambulant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 22 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 29 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,462,982
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,277
of 4,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,926
of 313,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#31
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.