| Title |
Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z |
| Authors |
Allan Lee, Gary Schwarz, Alexander Newman, Alison Legood |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 286 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Researcher | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 19% |
| Unknown | 94 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 94 | 33% |
| Psychology | 42 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 105 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,213,370
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#704
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,921
of 310,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#19
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.