↓ Skip to main content

Projective biomechanical depth matching for soft tissue registration in laparoscopic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Projective biomechanical depth matching for soft tissue registration in laparoscopic surgery
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11548-017-1613-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Reichard, Dominik Häntsch, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Stefan Suwelack, Martin Wagner, Hannes Kenngott, Beat Müller-Stich, Lena Maier-Hein, Rüdiger Dillmann, Stefanie Speidel

Abstract

A key component of computer- assisted surgery systems is the accurate and robust registration of preoperative planning data with intraoperative sensor data. In laparoscopic surgery, this image-based registration remains challenging due to soft tissue deformations. This paper presents a novel approach for biomechanical soft tissue registration of preoperative CT data with stereo endoscopic image data. The proposed method consists of two registrations steps. First, we use a 3D surface mosaic from partial surfaces reconstructed from stereo endoscopic images to initially align the biomechanical model with the intraoperative position and shape of the organ. After this initialization, the biomechanical model is projected onto newly captured surfaces, resulting in displacement boundary conditions, which in turn are used to update the biomechanical model. The method is evaluated in silico, using a human liver model, and in vivo, using porcine data. The quantitative in silico data shows a stable behaviour of the biomechanical model and root-mean-square deviation of volume vertices of under 3 mm with adjusted biomechanical parameters. This work contributes a fully automatic featureless non-rigid registration approach. The results of the in silico and in vivo experiments suggest that our method is able to handle dynamic deformations during surgery. Additional experiments, especially regarding human tissue behaviour, are an important next step towards clinical applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 26%
Computer Science 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,425,762
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#674
of 855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,760
of 313,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.