↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
AL amyloidosis patients with low amyloidogenic free light chain levels at first diagnosis have an excellent prognosis
Published in
Blood, May 2017
DOI 10.1182/blood-2017-02-767475
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The difference between involved minus uninvolved serum free light chains (dFLC) has been established as invaluable hematologic parameter in systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL). However, patients with initial dFLC below 50mg/L are currently deemed not evaluable for response to therapy. Therefore, we aimed to characterize this subgroup and to define novel hematologic response parameters. We retrospectively analyzed 783 AL patients newly diagnosed at our center between 2002 and 2016. Patients with dFLC<50 showed a smaller bone marrow plasmacytosis (7% vs. 10%, p<0.001), but no significant differences in all analyzed chromosomal aberrations. Cardiac involvement was less frequent (45 vs. 80%, p<0.001) and less severe (Mayo2004 stage III: 18% vs. 51%, p<0.001), while kidney involvement was more prevalent (83% vs. 53%, p<0.001) and proteinuria was higher (7.3g/l vs. 5.0g/l, p<0.001). In multivariate analyses, dFLC<50 appeared as independent prognostic factor with respect to overall survival (HR=0.50, p=0.003) and renal survival (HR=0.56, p=0.020). Patients with dFLC<50 showed a higher proportion of complete hematologic response (aCR) after first-line therapy (39% vs. 9%, p<0.001). Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis identified a "low-dFLC partial remission" (dFLC<10 for patients with dFLC between 20mg/L and 50mg/L), which predicted overall and renal survival already at 3 months after start of therapy. Importantly, a parallel Italian study (companion paper) validated this new hematologic remission parameter. The outcome of prospective clinical trials might be adversely influenced by exclusion of the favorable clinical subgroup with initial dFLC<50. We propose the appreciation of dFLC in hematologic response assessment for all patients with a baseline dFLC>20.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 19 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2025.
All research outputs
#2,883,394
of 32,743,222 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#4,075
of 43,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,512
of 351,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#78
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,743,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.