Title |
Thiamine reduces tissue lead levels in rats: mechanism of interaction
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioMetals, December 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10534-009-9282-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Srinivasa Y. Reddy, Raghu Pullakhandam, B. Dinesh Kumar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 29% |
Researcher | 5 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Chemistry | 2 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2018.
All research outputs
#851,057
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#11
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,193
of 166,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them