↓ Skip to main content

QTL Identification and Fine Mapping for Seed Storability in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Overview of attention for article published in Euphytica, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
QTL Identification and Fine Mapping for Seed Storability in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Published in
Euphytica, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10681-017-1913-5
Authors

C. S. Li, G. S. Shao, L. Wang, Z. F. Wang, Y. J. Mao, X. Q. Wang, X. H. Zhang, S. T. Liu, H. S. Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,552,700
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#934
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,068
of 313,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.