| Title |
Results of Clubfoot Management Using the Ponseti Method: Do the Details Matter? A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3463-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dahang Zhao, Hai Li, Li Zhao, Jianlin Liu, Zhenkai Wu, Fangchun Jin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 23% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,106
of 7,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,575
of 324,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#63
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.