| Title |
Content and misrepresentation in hierarchical generative models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Synthese, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-017-1435-7 |
| Authors |
Alex Kiefer, Jakob Hohwy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 19 | 19% |
| Psychology | 19 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,742,649
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#233
of 2,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,672
of 314,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#10
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.