| Title |
Chicha maize types and chicha manufacture in Peru
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, October 1960
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02908039 |
| Authors |
G. Edward Nicholson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 2 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 19% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#277
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206
of 1,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them