↓ Skip to main content

Policy Learning Mechanisms and the Regulation of US Drinking Water

Overview of attention for article published in Public Organization Review, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Policy Learning Mechanisms and the Regulation of US Drinking Water
Published in
Public Organization Review, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11115-015-0341-z
Authors

Michael Zarkin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Mathematics 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,552,700
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Public Organization Review
#104
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,385
of 397,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Organization Review
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.