| Title |
Diagnosing small bowel malabsorption: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Internal and Emergency Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11739-012-0877-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cinzia Papadia, Antonio Di Sabatino, Gino Roberto Corazza, Alastair Forbes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,490,851
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#372
of 944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,799
of 276,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.