↓ Skip to main content

Computer ethics: The role of personal, informal, and formal codes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, April 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Computer ethics: The role of personal, informal, and formal codes
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, April 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00380363
Authors

Margaret Anne Pierce, John W. Henry

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 126 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 50 37%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Lecturer 6 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 80 59%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 8%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Philosophy 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 20 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,195,155
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,140
of 2,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,273
of 27,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them