| Title |
Land-use effects on local biodiversity in tropical forests vary between continents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1356-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen R. P. Phillips, Tim Newbold, Andy Purvis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 47% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 299 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 15% |
| Researcher | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 122 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 75 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 76 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2020.
All research outputs
#485,012
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#46
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,892
of 331,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.