↓ Skip to main content

Learning of Core Disciplinary Ideas: Efficacy Comparison of Two Contrasting Modes of Science Instruction

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Science Education, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Learning of Core Disciplinary Ideas: Efficacy Comparison of Two Contrasting Modes of Science Instruction
Published in
Research in Science Education, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11165-016-9573-3
Authors

David Schuster, William W. Cobern, Betty AJ Adams, Adriana Undreiu, Brandy Pleasants

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 7 7%
Lecturer 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 27 29%
Computer Science 7 7%
Physics and Astronomy 5 5%
Mathematics 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 31 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,066,800
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Research in Science Education
#283
of 658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,069
of 313,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Science Education
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 658 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.