↓ Skip to main content

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy can Safely and Durably Control Sites of Extra-Central Nervous System Oligoprogressive Disease in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Lung Cancer Patients Receiving…

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stereotactic Radiation Therapy can Safely and Durably Control Sites of Extra-Central Nervous System Oligoprogressive Disease in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Crizotinib
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory N. Gan, Andrew J. Weickhardt, Benjamin Scheier, Robert C. Doebele, Laurie E. Gaspar, Brian D. Kavanagh, D. Ross Camidge

Abstract

To analyze the durability and toxicity of radiotherapeutic local ablative therapy (LAT) applied to extra-central nervous system (eCNS) disease progression in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 33 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#839,460
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#238
of 11,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,010
of 321,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#2
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.