| Title |
Enhancing gardens as habitats for plant-associated invertebrates: should we plant native or exotic species?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1377-x |
| Authors |
Andrew Salisbury, Sarah Al-Beidh, James Armitage, Stephanie Bird, Helen Bostock, Anna Platoni, Mark Tatchell, Ken Thompson, Joe Perry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 61% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,633,307
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#225
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,756
of 318,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.