↓ Skip to main content

Bone turnover markers and pharmacokinetics of a new sustained-release formulation of the cathepsin K inhibitor, ONO-5334, in healthy post-menopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Bone turnover markers and pharmacokinetics of a new sustained-release formulation of the cathepsin K inhibitor, ONO-5334, in healthy post-menopausal women
Published in
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00774-013-0558-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinichi Nagase, Michiyo Ohyama, Yoshitaka Hashimoto, Maria Small, John Sharpe, Junichiro Manako, Tomohiro Kuwayama, Steve Deacon

Abstract

A sustained-release tablet (SRT) of ONO-5334 was compared to the immediate-release tablet (IRT) dose, which demonstrated effects on bone mineral density (BMD) comparable to those of therapy with alendronate. The single-dose phase was a randomized, partial single-blind, crossover study where 50-, 100-, and 300-mg SRTs and 300-mg IRTs were administered to nine post-menopausal women. The multiple-dose phase was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study where 100- and 300-mg SRTs, or placebo were administered to 24 women. After a single administration of a 300-mg SRT, mean C max was 3.3-fold lower, mean AUCinf was 0.83-fold lower and mean C 24h was 5.4-fold higher compared to the 300-mg IRT. Repeated SRT dosing did not significantly affect PK, although C 24h increased slightly. After a single ONO-5334 dose, serum CTX-I was suppressed by ~50 % within 1 h, reaching maximum suppression 6 h post-dose. Greater suppression was maintained longer by the 300-mg SRT vs. the 300-mg IRT. Second morning void and cumulative urine CTX-I showed clear dose-response effects at/over 24 h for SRT, with maximum suppression occurring at/over 24 h (except 50- and 300-mg cumulative urine). Repeated dosing suggested greater suppression of urine CTX-I. Compared with the IRT, the SRT showed reduced C max, greater C 24h, and slightly reduced AUCinf dose for dose. The SRT showed clear dose-response suppression on bone resorption and greater efficacy dose for dose vs. the IRT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Mathematics 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2014.
All research outputs
#21,180,380
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#563
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,317
of 311,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.